Description of project idea
Allpix Squared is a mid-size project with a very active and diverse user community. Users come from all sorts of backgrounds, from PhD or master students to senior scientists, and from different fields. They come with different levels of knowledge on programming, on Monte Carlo simulations or on silicon detectors.
Having a comprehensive documentation was always a strong point of this project, and our goal for the documentation is to provide each user (from novice student to potential contributor and seasoned developer) the information he needs.
The documentation of our project consists of several parts, which live in different spaces as detailed below:
- Website: The first point of contact should be the website. It is built using the static website generator
hugo
based on the very simple beautiful-hugo
theme and contains, most importantly, the “news” section used for publishing release announcements and release notes. Furthermore, some installation information (mostly redundant to the user manual) and screenshots illustrating different use cases are provided.
- User Manual: The main documentation of the framework consists of a 160-page user manual document which is generated from LaTeX code in the main software repository as well as Markdown files for individual parts of the framework - translated to LaTeX using
pandoc
. This happens automatically for new releases and it is published
- Online as HTML version with a link from the website (using
latex2html
)
- As PDF document, linked from the website (using
pdflatex
)
- Doxygen Code Reference: In addition to the user manual, also the source code is heavily documented and a HTML reference guide is automatically generated using
doxygen
and deployed on the website.
With over 3.5 years of continuous development and additions, the documentation has become a bit cluttered and we would like to streamline it with your help:
- Content: We would like to separate more clearly which parts of the documentation are intended for users which are not expected to alter a single line of code, from those targeting developers who would like to contribute to the project or would like to extend their own copy of the software for their specific application. Also, we would like to review the current user manual for potentially lacking information or areas where we could improve.
- Infrastructure: We would like to streamline the way we present the documentation and especially improve its online representation. Optimally we would end up with a streamlined, fully-integrated online presence which coherently presents news, manual and code reference. One possibility for this would e.g. be moving the documentation to Docsy.dev. The challenging part about this is that we would like to keep as much as possible of our current automatic deployment and workflow.
- Bonus task: For those of you who would like to dive a bit deeper into the scientific depth of this project - we currently do have a few examples for users to understand how to start using the framework and how to use certain features, but they are not very nicely presented and not very extensively documented. They could use a good polishing. Ultimately, these and further examples can be streamlined to follow a tutorial-like workflow.
Project duration
We are open for both standard-length projects (3 months) and long-running (6 months) projects, depending on what you think is required to achieve the results we are aiming for.
Given the good overall level of documentation of the project, we think a standard project might suffice.
Expected results
- A restructured user manual which clearly separates content intended for users and developers. This could also be separate documents, like a User Manual and a Developer Guide.
- A reviewed manual with previously missing information on the project and the framework
- A streamlined online presence which better integrates project website, documentation and code reference
Experience required
Our current documentation workflow consists of a few tools and in order to rip them apart it would be good to have a solid understanding of:
LaTeX, Doxygen, pandoc, hugo, git, GitLab and its Continuous Integration - as well as of all the new and cool tools that you will introduce to make our documentation sparkle.
Mentors
Corresponding Project
Participating Organizations